WallStSmart

Comcast Holdings Corp (CCZ)vsTerreno Realty Corporation (TRNO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TRNO leads profitability with a 77.3% profit margin vs 0.0%. TRNO trades at a lower P/E of 17.8x. TRNO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CCZ

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.48

TRNO

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 6.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CCZ.

TRNOUndervalued (+68.6%)

Margin of Safety

+68.6%

Fair Value

$208.21

Current Price

$66.38

$141.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $208.21Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CCZ2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$61.13B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.19B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

TRNO5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
77.3%10/10

Keeps 77 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
41.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.8%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CCZ4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

Operating margin of 0.0%

TRNO2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
7.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-40.2%2/10

Earnings declined 40.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CCZ

The strongest argument for CCZ centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TRNO

The strongest argument for TRNO centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 77.3% and operating margin at 41.8%. Revenue growth of 11.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CCZ

The primary concerns for CCZ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. A P/E of 55.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : TRNO

The primary concerns for TRNO are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CCZ profiles as a value stock while TRNO is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

TRNO is growing revenue faster at 11.1% — sustainability is the question.

CCZ generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor REIT - RESIDENTIAL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TRNO scores higher overall (56/100 vs 21/100), backed by strong 77.3% margins and 11.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Comcast Holdings Corp

REAL ESTATE · REIT - RESIDENTIAL · USA

Comcast Holdings Corp.

Terreno Realty Corporation

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

Terreno Realty Corporation and together with its subsidiaries, the?

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?