WallStSmart

Constellation Energy Corp (CEG)vsMorgan Stanley (MS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Morgan Stanley generates 187% more annual revenue ($73.17B vs $25.53B). MS leads profitability with a 24.7% profit margin vs 9.1%. MS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.33. MS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

CEG

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 2.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.14

MS

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CEGSignificantly Overvalued (-44.5%)

Margin of Safety

-44.5%

Fair Value

$191.58

Current Price

$303.63

$112.05 premium

UndervaluedFair: $191.58Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CEG1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$112.78B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

MS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$299.95B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
40.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.6%

Profit MarginProfitability
24.7%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.3%8/10

16.3% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CEG4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
42.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-48.9%2/10

Earnings declined 48.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-181.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

MS3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.334/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-7.85B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CEG

The strongest argument for CEG centers on Market Cap. Revenue growth of 12.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MS

The strongest argument for MS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.7% and operating margin at 40.6%. Revenue growth of 16.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CEG

The primary concerns for CEG are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 42.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : MS

The primary concerns for MS are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CEG profiles as a value stock while MS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

MS is growing revenue faster at 16.3% — sustainability is the question.

CEG generates stronger free cash flow (-181M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 24.7% margins and 16.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Constellation Energy Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Constellation Energy Corporation is an energy producer in the United States. The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.

Visit Website →

Morgan Stanley

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in the Morgan Stanley Building, Midtown Manhattan, New York City.

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?