WallStSmart

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF)vsCNA Financial Corporation (CNA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CNA Financial Corporation generates 10% more annual revenue ($15.35B vs $13.95B). CINF leads profitability with a 23.8% profit margin vs 7.9%. CNA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.92. CINF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 87/100 (A).

CINF

Exceptional Buy

87

out of 100

Grade: A

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.66

CNA

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.21

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CINF6 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
37.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.6%10/10

Revenue surging 31.6% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
85.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 85.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Profit MarginProfitability
23.8%9/10

Keeps 24 of every $100 in revenue as profit

CNA4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.928/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

CINF2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.194/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.664/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

CNA3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-22.2%2/10

Earnings declined 22.2%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.212/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CINF

The strongest argument for CINF centers on P/E Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.8% and operating margin at 37.2%. Revenue growth of 31.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CNA

The strongest argument for CNA centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.92 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CINF

The primary concerns for CINF are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : CNA

The primary concerns for CNA are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CINF profiles as a growth stock while CNA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CINF carries more volatility with a beta of 0.55 — expect wider price swings.

CINF is growing revenue faster at 31.6% — sustainability is the question.

CINF generates stronger free cash flow (698M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CINF scores higher overall (87/100 vs 64/100), backed by strong 23.8% margins and 31.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cincinnati Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

Cincinnati Financial Corporation offers property and casualty insurance, its main business, through The Cincinnati Insurance Company, The Cincinnati Indemnity Company and The Cincinnati Casualty Company.

CNA Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

CNA Financial Corporation offers commercial property and casualty insurance products primarily in the United States.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?