WallStSmart

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF)vsCNA Financial Corporation (CNA)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CNA Financial Corporation generates 14% more annual revenue ($15.15B vs $13.28B). CINF leads profitability with a 20.1% profit margin vs 8.2%. CNA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.92. CNA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

CINF

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.5Value: 6.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.66

CNA

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 7.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.21

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CINF4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Profit MarginProfitability
20.1%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

CNA4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.299/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.928/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

CINF4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.194/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.664/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-18.2%2/10

Revenue declined 18.2%

CNA2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.0%4/10

3.0% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.212/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CINF

The strongest argument for CINF centers on P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.1% and operating margin at 18.5%.

Bull Case : CNA

The strongest argument for CNA centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.92 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CINF

The primary concerns for CINF are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : CNA

The primary concerns for CNA are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CINF profiles as a declining stock while CNA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CINF carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.

CNA is growing revenue faster at 3.0% — sustainability is the question.

CINF generates stronger free cash flow (698M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNA scores higher overall (66/100 vs 59/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cincinnati Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

Cincinnati Financial Corporation offers property and casualty insurance, its main business, through The Cincinnati Insurance Company, The Cincinnati Indemnity Company and The Cincinnati Casualty Company.

CNA Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

CNA Financial Corporation offers commercial property and casualty insurance products primarily in the United States.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?