Cellebrite DI (CLBT)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)
CLBT
Cellebrite DI
$11.23
-0.84%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $2.87B
PANW
Palo Alto Networks Inc
$330.65
-2.32%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $270.47B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 2132% more annual revenue ($11.48B vs $514.29M). CLBT leads profitability with a 11.4% profit margin vs 2.7%. CLBT trades at a lower P/E of 49.7x. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).
CLBT
Hold38
out of 100
Grade: F
PANW
Buy51
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-2.4%
Fair Value
$11.16
Current Price
$11.23
$0.07 premium
Margin of Safety
+34.1%
Fair Value
$501.81
Current Price
$330.65
$171.16 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
15.8% revenue growth
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Revenue surging 34.4% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Areas to Watch
Distress zone — elevated risk
Weak financial health signals
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Earnings declined 67.9%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Trading at 9.8x book value
ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency
2.7% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CLBT
The strongest argument for CLBT centers on Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 15.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : PANW
The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 34.4% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CLBT
The primary concerns for CLBT are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 49.7x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : PANW
The primary concerns for PANW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 295.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CLBT profiles as a growth stock while PANW is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.
CLBT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.
PANW is growing revenue faster at 34.4% — sustainability is the question.
PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
PANW scores higher overall (51/100 vs 38/100) and 34.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Cellebrite DI
TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA
Cellebrite DI Ltd. provides digital intelligence solutions for the public and private sectors globally. The company is headquartered in Petah Tikva, Israel.
Palo Alto Networks Inc
TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.
Compare with Other SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?