WallStSmart

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF)vsArcelorMittal SA ADR (MT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ArcelorMittal SA ADR generates 227% more annual revenue ($62.85B vs $19.20B). MT leads profitability with a 2.9% profit margin vs -4.6%. MT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.42. MT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

CLF

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.5Value: 8.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.13

MT

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 6.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLFUndervalued (+66.1%)

Margin of Safety

+66.1%

Fair Value

$36.82

Current Price

$12.06

$24.76 discount

UndervaluedFair: $36.82Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLF2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MT4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Market CapQuality
$59.37B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CLF4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
0.3%3/10

Operating margin of 0.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.373/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-20.9%2/10

ROE of -20.9% — below average capital efficiency

MT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.3%3/10

ROE of 3.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-61.7%2/10

Earnings declined 61.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLF

The strongest argument for CLF centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.43 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MT

The strongest argument for MT centers on PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.42 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CLF

The primary concerns for CLF are Operating Margin, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MT

The primary concerns for MT are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLF profiles as a turnaround stock while MT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLF carries more volatility with a beta of 2.11 — expect wider price swings.

CLF is growing revenue faster at 5.9% — sustainability is the question.

CLF generates stronger free cash flow (73M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLF scores higher overall (50/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. is an independent iron ore mining company in the United States, Canada and internationally. The company is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio.

Visit Website →

ArcelorMittal SA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

ArcelorMittal owns and operates steelmaking and mining facilities in Europe, North and South America, Asia and Africa. The company is headquartered in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?