Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsCanadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$380.99
+1.45%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $43.18B
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$46.92
+3.83%
ENERGY · Cap: $92.88B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 181% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $13.79B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs 7.0%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).
CLS
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
CNQ
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.
Margin of Safety
+55.1%
Fair Value
$90.53
Current Price
$46.92
$43.61 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 52 in profit
Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Earnings expanding 371.8% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit
Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Areas to Watch
7.0% margin — thin
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Trading at 20.9x book value
1.5% revenue growth
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CLS
The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.
Bear Case : CLS
The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 45.5x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while CNQ is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.
CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.
CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (856M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 67/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. CNQ offers better value entry with a 55.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Celestica Inc.
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Compare with Other ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?