WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsData I/O Corporation (DAIO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 74140% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $18.57M). CLS leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs -43.2%. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.87

DAIO

Avoid

22

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.50
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.

DAIOSignificantly Overvalued (-18.0%)

Margin of Safety

-18.0%

Fair Value

$2.61

Current Price

$3.60

$0.99 premium

UndervaluedFair: $2.61Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
46.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 47 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

DAIO1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
47.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
23.3x2/10

Trading at 23.3x book value

DAIO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.504/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$36.92M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-74.3%2/10

ROE of -74.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : DAIO

The strongest argument for DAIO centers on Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 47.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : DAIO

The primary concerns for DAIO are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while DAIO is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (127M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 22/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Data I/O Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Data I / O Corporation is dedicated to the design, manufacture, and sale of programming and security implementation systems and services for electronic device manufacturers in the United States, Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Redmond, Washington.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?