WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsFabrinet (FN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 268% more annual revenue ($15.59B vs $4.24B). FN leads profitability with a 9.9% profit margin vs 7.2%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.87

FN

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 7.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.74

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
45.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
62.4%10/10

Revenue surging 62.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
74.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 74.2% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

FN4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
39.3%10/10

Revenue surging 39.3% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
53.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 53.3% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.7410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
16.8x4/10

Trading at 16.8x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

FN4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-10.83M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 62.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : FN

The strongest argument for FN centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 39.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : FN

The primary concerns for FN are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.51 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 62.4% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (147M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 67/100) and 62.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Fabrinet

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Fabrinet offers optical packaging and precision electronic, electromechanical and optical manufacturing services in North America, Asia-Pacific and Europe. The company is headquartered in George Town, the Cayman Islands.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?