WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsKULR Technology Group Inc (KULR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 96785% more annual revenue ($15.59B vs $16.10M). CLS leads profitability with a 7.2% profit margin vs 0.0%. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.87

KULR

Avoid

24

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 7.07
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.

KULRUndervalued (+80.8%)

Margin of Safety

+80.8%

Fair Value

$14.81

Current Price

$2.38

$12.43 discount

UndervaluedFair: $14.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
45.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
62.4%10/10

Revenue surging 62.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
74.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 74.2% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

KULR2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
7.0710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
14.7x4/10

Trading at 14.7x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

KULR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$118.02M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 62.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : KULR

The strongest argument for KULR centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : KULR

The primary concerns for KULR are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while KULR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KULR carries more volatility with a beta of 2.32 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 62.4% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (147M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (67/100 vs 24/100) and 62.4% revenue growth. KULR offers better value entry with a 80.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

KULR Technology Group Inc

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

KULR Technology Group, Inc., through its subsidiary, KULR Technology Corporation, develops and markets thermal management technologies for batteries, electronics, and other component applications in the United States. The company is headquartered in Campbell, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?