Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsKULR Technology Group Inc (KULR)
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$352.52
+7.36%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $34.65B
KULR
KULR Technology Group Inc
$2.42
-4.35%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $121.66M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Celestica Inc. generates 74163% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $18.57M). CLS leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs 0.0%. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).
CLS
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
KULR
Avoid34
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.
Margin of Safety
+83.8%
Fair Value
$17.56
Current Price
$2.42
$15.14 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit
Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Revenue surging 97.9% year-over-year
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Trading at 19.3x book value
7.0% margin — thin
0.0% earnings growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
0.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CLS
The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : KULR
The strongest argument for KULR centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 97.9% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CLS
The primary concerns for CLS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin.
Bear Case : KULR
The primary concerns for KULR are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
KULR carries more volatility with a beta of 2.26 — expect wider price swings.
KULR is growing revenue faster at 97.9% — sustainability is the question.
CLS generates stronger free cash flow (147M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 34/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. KULR offers better value entry with a 83.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Celestica Inc.
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
KULR Technology Group Inc
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
KULR Technology Group, Inc., through its subsidiary, KULR Technology Corporation, develops and markets thermal management technologies for batteries, electronics, and other component applications in the United States. The company is headquartered in Campbell, California.
Compare with Other ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?