Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsLittelfuse Inc (LFUS)
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$206.61
+0.51%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $34.87B
LFUS
Littelfuse Inc
$355.72
+2.10%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $10.27B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Celestica Inc. generates 497% more annual revenue ($15.59B vs $2.61B). CLS leads profitability with a 7.2% profit margin vs -0.3%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).
CLS
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
LFUS
Buy57
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.
Margin of Safety
-46.9%
Fair Value
$243.71
Current Price
$355.72
$112.01 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 62.4% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 74.2% YoY
Every $100 of equity generates 20 in profit
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Growing faster than its price suggests
Earnings expanding 51.7% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Revenue surging 20.4% year-over-year
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
Trading at 10.7x book value
7.2% margin — thin
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
ROE of -0.3% — below average capital efficiency
Currently unprofitable
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CLS
The strongest argument for CLS centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 62.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : LFUS
The strongest argument for LFUS centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.4% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CLS
The primary concerns for CLS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin.
Bear Case : LFUS
The primary concerns for LFUS are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity. A P/E of 328.5x leaves little room for execution misses.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while LFUS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
LFUS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.
CLS is growing revenue faster at 62.4% — sustainability is the question.
LFUS generates stronger free cash flow (216M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CLS scores higher overall (67/100 vs 57/100) and 62.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Celestica Inc.
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
Littelfuse Inc
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
Littelfuse, Inc. manufactures and sells circuit protection, power control, and sensing products in Asia-Pacific, the Americas, and Europe. The company is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.
Visit Website →Compare with Other ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?