WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsQMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 660290% more annual revenue ($12.39B vs $1.88M). CLS leads profitability with a 6.7% profit margin vs -1.5%. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLSUndervalued (+11.6%)

Margin of Safety

+11.6%

Fair Value

$334.62

Current Price

$302.22

$32.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $334.62Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QMMM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
40.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 41 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.6%10/10

Revenue surging 43.6% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
77.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 77.7% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
15.7x4/10

Trading at 15.7x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
42.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.0%2/10

ROE of -2.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 43.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 42.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while QMMM is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 43.6% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (158M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 14/100) and 43.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?