WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsSanmina Corporation (SANM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 22% more annual revenue ($15.59B vs $12.76B). CLS leads profitability with a 7.2% profit margin vs 2.4%. SANM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.67. SANM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

CLS

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.87

SANM

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.87

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
45.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
62.4%10/10

Revenue surging 62.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
74.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 74.2% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

SANM3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.7%10/10

Revenue surging 69.7% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
68.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 68.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.678/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
16.1x4/10

Trading at 16.1x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

SANM3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
35.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.874/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
2.4%3/10

2.4% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 62.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SANM

The strongest argument for SANM centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 69.7% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.67 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : SANM

The primary concerns for SANM are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. Thin 2.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SANM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.60 — expect wider price swings.

SANM is growing revenue faster at 69.7% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (147M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SANM scores higher overall (71/100 vs 67/100) and 69.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Sanmina Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Sanmina Corporation offers integrated solutions for manufacturing, components, products and repair, logistics and after-sales services globally. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?