WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsConstellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 51% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $9.14B). STZ leads profitability with a 18.5% profit margin vs 7.0%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

STZ

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.95

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
52.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 52 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

STZ3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
22.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
26.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.7%

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
46.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
20.6x2/10

Trading at 20.6x book value

STZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
2.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.3%2/10

Revenue declined 11.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : STZ

The strongest argument for STZ centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.5% and operating margin at 26.7%.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 46.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : STZ

The primary concerns for STZ are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while STZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.

STZ generates stronger free cash flow (344M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 56/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Constellation Brands Inc Class A

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Constellation Brands, Inc., headquartered in Victor, New York, is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?