WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsGfl Environmental Holdings Inc (GFL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cummins Inc generates 409% more annual revenue ($33.67B vs $6.62B). GFL leads profitability with a 58.0% profit margin vs 8.4%. CMI trades at a lower P/E of 31.1x. CMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CMI

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.91

GFL

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 4.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.77
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMISignificantly Overvalued (-61.7%)

Margin of Safety

-61.7%

Fair Value

$370.38

Current Price

$671.01

$300.63 premium

UndervaluedFair: $370.38Overvalued
GFLUndervalued (+5.1%)

Margin of Safety

+5.1%

Fair Value

$46.42

Current Price

$40.11

$6.31 discount

UndervaluedFair: $46.42Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$88.34B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
41.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 41.4% YoY

GFL3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
58.0%10/10

Keeps 58 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

CMI3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.764/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
31.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

GFL4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.3%3/10

ROE of 3.3% — below average capital efficiency

Debt/EquityHealth
1.093/10

Elevated debt levels

P/E RatioValuation
98.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.772/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : GFL

The strongest argument for GFL centers on Profit Margin, Price/Book, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 58.0% and operating margin at 6.4%.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : GFL

The primary concerns for GFL are Return on Equity, Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 98.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI profiles as a value stock while GFL is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CMI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

GFL is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

CMI generates stronger free cash flow (990M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMI scores higher overall (59/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

GFL Environmental Inc. is a diversified environmental services company in Canada and the United States. The company is headquartered in Vaughan, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?