WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsAmmo Inc (POWW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cummins Inc generates 73065% more annual revenue ($33.67B vs $46.02M). CMI leads profitability with a 8.4% profit margin vs -32.0%. CMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CMI

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.91

POWW

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMISignificantly Overvalued (-61.7%)

Margin of Safety

-61.7%

Fair Value

$370.38

Current Price

$671.01

$300.63 premium

UndervaluedFair: $370.38Overvalued
POWWUndervalued (+86.7%)

Margin of Safety

+86.7%

Fair Value

$14.48

Current Price

$2.03

$12.45 discount

UndervaluedFair: $14.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$88.34B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
41.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 41.4% YoY

POWW2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
53.2%10/10

Revenue surging 53.2% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CMI3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.764/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
31.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

POWW4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$240.44M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.9%2/10

ROE of -10.9% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-75.0%2/10

Earnings declined 75.0%

Profit MarginProfitability
-32.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : POWW

The strongest argument for POWW centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 53.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : POWW

The primary concerns for POWW are Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI profiles as a value stock while POWW is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

POWW carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

POWW is growing revenue faster at 53.2% — sustainability is the question.

CMI generates stronger free cash flow (990M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMI scores higher overall (59/100 vs 37/100). POWW offers better value entry with a 86.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

Ammo Inc

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Ammo, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, markets and sells ammunition and ammunition component products for use in handguns and long guns in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?