WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cummins Inc generates 161% more annual revenue ($33.89B vs $12.98B). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs 7.9%. WDS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.33. WDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

CMI

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.91

WDS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMISignificantly Overvalued (-59.1%)

Margin of Safety

-59.1%

Fair Value

$376.46

Current Price

$679.55

$303.09 premium

UndervaluedFair: $376.46Overvalued
WDSUndervalued (+31.5%)

Margin of Safety

+31.5%

Fair Value

$27.39

Current Price

$21.57

$5.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $27.39Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$94.23B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

WDS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
20.9%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

CMI4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.854/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

WDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-14.4%2/10

Earnings declined 14.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : WDS

The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WDS

The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI profiles as a value stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CMI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

CMI is growing revenue faster at 2.7% — sustainability is the question.

WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WDS scores higher overall (53/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 20.9% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?