WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cummins Inc generates 148% more annual revenue ($33.67B vs $13.55B). CMI leads profitability with a 8.4% profit margin vs -1.6%. CMI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.47. CMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

CMI

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.91

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMIUndervalued (+37.7%)

Margin of Safety

+37.7%

Fair Value

$960.80

Current Price

$553.36

$407.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $960.80Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WPP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$76.65B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
41.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 41.4% YoY

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CMI2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth. PEG of 1.47 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CMI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

CMI is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMI scores higher overall (61/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?