WallStSmart

CMS Energy Corporation 5.6% JRSUB NT 78 (CMSA)vsDuke Energy Corporation (DUK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

DUK leads profitability with a 16.0% profit margin vs 0.0%. CMSA trades at a lower P/E of 10.8x. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

CMSA

Avoid

20

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.65

DUK

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CMSA.

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-79.6%)

Margin of Safety

-79.6%

Fair Value

$66.50

Current Price

$119.42

$52.92 premium

UndervaluedFair: $66.50Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMSA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

DUK4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$93.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
18.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

Areas to Watch

CMSA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

Operating margin of 0.0%

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.673/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMSA

The strongest argument for CMSA centers on P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.0% and operating margin at 27.5%.

Bear Case : CMSA

The primary concerns for CMSA are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.97 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.67 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

CMSA generates stronger free cash flow (-345M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor MULTILINE UTILITIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (63/100 vs 20/100), backed by strong 16.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CMS Energy Corporation 5.6% JRSUB NT 78

UTILITIES · MULTILINE UTILITIES · USA

CMS Energy Corporation is an energy company primarily in Michigan. The company is headquartered in Jackson, Michigan.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?