WallStSmart

CN Energy Group Inc (CNEY)vsMP Materials Corp (MP)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MP Materials Corp generates 1028% more annual revenue ($416.25M vs $36.92M). MP leads profitability with a -14.6% profit margin vs -183.1%. CNEY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 43/100 (D).

CNEY

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 11.78

MP

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.51
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNEYUndervalued (+45.2%)

Margin of Safety

+45.2%

Fair Value

$1.88

Current Price

$0.48

$1.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1.88Overvalued
MPUndervalued (+12.6%)

Margin of Safety

+12.6%

Fair Value

$43.82

Current Price

$41.06

$2.76 discount

UndervaluedFair: $43.82Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNEY4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
76.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 76.7% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
11.7810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
119.7%10/10

Revenue surging 119.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CNEY4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$2.24M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-4.1%2/10

ROE of -4.1% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.24M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.514/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-223.49M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNEY

The strongest argument for CNEY centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 119.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CNEY

The primary concerns for CNEY are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNEY profiles as a turnaround stock while MP is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.99 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 119.7% — sustainability is the question.

CNEY generates stronger free cash flow (-1M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNEY scores higher overall (43/100 vs 30/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CN Energy Group Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · China

CN Energy Group. The company is headquartered in Lishui, China.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?