WallStSmart

CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH)vsTwin Disc Incorporated (TWIN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CNH Industrial N.V. generates 4670% more annual revenue ($18.19B vs $381.27M). TWIN leads profitability with a 7.1% profit margin vs 1.7%. CNH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.38. TWIN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

CNH

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.56

TWIN

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 6.0Value: 6.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.93
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CNH.

TWINUndervalued (+34.7%)

Margin of Safety

+34.7%

Fair Value

$26.37

Current Price

$24.54

$1.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $26.37Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3810/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TWIN5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
547.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 547.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.209/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
12.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.3%8/10

18.3% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CNH4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.564/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.0%3/10

ROE of 4.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.7%3/10

1.7% margin — thin

TWIN3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Market CapQuality
$343.98M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
7.1%3/10

7.1% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNH

The strongest argument for CNH centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TWIN

The strongest argument for TWIN centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CNH

The primary concerns for CNH are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 57.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 3.39 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TWIN

The primary concerns for TWIN are Market Cap, Profit Margin, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNH profiles as a value stock while TWIN is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

TWIN is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.

TWIN generates stronger free cash flow (17M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TWIN scores higher overall (63/100 vs 49/100) and 18.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CNH Industrial N.V.

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

CNH Industrial N.V., an equipment and services company, engages in the design, production, marketing, sale, and financing of agricultural and construction equipment in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, South America, and the Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Basildon, the United Kingdom.

Twin Disc Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Twin Disc, Incorporated designs, manufactures and sells power transmission equipment for off-highway and marine use worldwide. The company is headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?