WallStSmart

CenterPoint Energy Inc (CNP)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CenterPoint Energy Inc generates 325% more annual revenue ($9.62B vs $2.27B). CNP leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs -1.0%. CNP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.67. CNP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

CNP

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.57

TAC

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNPSignificantly Overvalued (-71.8%)

Margin of Safety

-71.8%

Fair Value

$22.11

Current Price

$37.84

$15.73 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.11Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNP3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 23.3% YoY

TAC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.3%

Areas to Watch

CNP4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.674/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-592.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.572/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-71.6%2/10

Earnings declined 71.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNP

The strongest argument for CNP centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 10.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TAC

The strongest argument for TAC centers on Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CNP

The primary concerns for CNP are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 2.14 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.38 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNP profiles as a value stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.46 — expect wider price swings.

TAC is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (17M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNP scores higher overall (66/100 vs 43/100) and 10.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CenterPoint Energy Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

CenterPoint Energy, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 electric and natural gas utility serving several markets in the American states of Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas.

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?