WallStSmart

Cementos Pacasmayo SAA ADR (CPAC)vsMP Materials Corp (MP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cementos Pacasmayo SAA ADR generates 547% more annual revenue ($2.25B vs $347.57M). CPAC leads profitability with a 9.5% profit margin vs -20.5%. CPAC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CPAC

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.59

MP

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CPACUndervalued (+16.2%)

Margin of Safety

+16.2%

Fair Value

$12.99

Current Price

$12.10

$0.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $12.99Overvalued
MPOvervalued (-11.4%)

Margin of Safety

-11.4%

Fair Value

$37.04

Current Price

$41.65

$4.61 premium

UndervaluedFair: $37.04Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CPAC5 strengths · Avg: 8.4/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
61.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 61.1% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
16.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.4%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.4%8/10

15.4% revenue growth

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
118.6%10/10

Revenue surging 118.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CPAC3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.594/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$1.02B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.033/10

Elevated debt levels

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-79.28M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CPAC

The strongest argument for CPAC centers on EPS Growth, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 15.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.13 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 118.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CPAC

The primary concerns for CPAC are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CPAC profiles as a growth stock while MP is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.86 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 118.6% — sustainability is the question.

CPAC generates stronger free cash flow (176M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CPAC scores higher overall (68/100 vs 30/100) and 15.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cementos Pacasmayo SAA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · BUILDING MATERIALS · USA

Cementos Pacasmayo SAA, a cement company, produces, distributes and sells cement and cement-related materials in Peru. The company is headquartered in Lima, Peru.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?