WallStSmart

Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC)vsLas Vegas Sands Corp (LVS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Las Vegas Sands Corp generates 21925% more annual revenue ($13.02B vs $59.10M). LVS leads profitability with a 12.5% profit margin vs -2.3%. LVS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

CPHC

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0

LVS

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.7Profit: 8.0Value: 10.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.41
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CPHC.

LVSUndervalued (+47.5%)

Margin of Safety

+47.5%

Fair Value

$109.98

Current Price

$54.17

$55.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $109.98Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CPHC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LVS5 strengths · Avg: 8.4/10
Return on EquityProfitability
73.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 73 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.958/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
23.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.0%8/10

Revenue surging 26.0% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
29.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 29.3% YoY

Areas to Watch

CPHC4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$80.67M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.2%3/10

ROE of 0.2% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.0%2/10

Revenue declined 5.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-75.0%2/10

Earnings declined 75.0%

LVS3 concerns · Avg: 1.7/10
Price/BookValuation
23.0x2/10

Trading at 23.0x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.412/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
10.151/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CPHC

The strongest argument for CPHC centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : LVS

The strongest argument for LVS centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 26.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.95 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CPHC

The primary concerns for CPHC are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : LVS

The primary concerns for LVS are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 10.15 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CPHC profiles as a turnaround stock while LVS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

LVS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.89 — expect wider price swings.

LVS is growing revenue faster at 26.0% — sustainability is the question.

LVS generates stronger free cash flow (930M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LVS scores higher overall (71/100 vs 32/100) and 26.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canterbury Park Holding Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESORTS & CASINOS · USA

Canterbury Park Holding Corporation organizes mutual wagering on horse racing and unbanked card games at its Canterbury Park racetrack and card casino in Shakopee, Minnesota. The company is headquartered in Shakopee, Minnesota.

Las Vegas Sands Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESORTS & CASINOS · USA

Las Vegas Sands Corporation is an American casino and resort company based in Paradise, Nevada, United States. Its resorts feature accommodations, gambling and entertainment, convention and exhibition facilities, restaurants and clubs, as well as an art and science museum in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?