WallStSmart

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS)vsESAB Corp (ESAB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Carpenter Technology Corporation generates 4% more annual revenue ($2.94B vs $2.84B). CRS leads profitability with a 14.8% profit margin vs 8.0%. ESAB appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.03. CRS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

CRS

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 8.7Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.16

ESAB

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.78
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRSUndervalued (+8.4%)

Margin of Safety

+8.4%

Fair Value

$403.42

Current Price

$362.40

$41.02 discount

UndervaluedFair: $403.42Overvalued
ESABSignificantly Overvalued (-380.1%)

Margin of Safety

-380.1%

Fair Value

$28.02

Current Price

$94.21

$66.19 premium

UndervaluedFair: $28.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRS4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
23.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
25.9%8/10

Earnings expanding 25.9% YoY

ESAB1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CRS3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.594/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
9.1x4/10

Trading at 9.1x book value

P/E RatioValuation
44.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

ESAB4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.784/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-31.6%2/10

Earnings declined 31.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRS

The strongest argument for CRS centers on Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : ESAB

The strongest argument for ESAB centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.03 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CRS

The primary concerns for CRS are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 44.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : ESAB

The primary concerns for ESAB are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

ESAB is growing revenue faster at 7.5% — sustainability is the question.

CRS generates stronger free cash flow (86M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor METAL FABRICATION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CRS scores higher overall (63/100 vs 55/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Carpenter Technology Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · METAL FABRICATION · USA

Carpenter Technology Corporation manufactures, manufactures and distributes specialty metals worldwide. The company is headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

ESAB Corp

INDUSTRIALS · METAL FABRICATION · USA

ESAB Corporation formulates, develops, manufactures and supplies consumable products and equipment for use in automated cutting, joining and welding, as well as gas control equipment. The company is headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?