WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsFomento Economico Mexicano (FMX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fomento Economico Mexicano generates 17376% more annual revenue ($840.95B vs $4.81B). FMX leads profitability with a 2.3% profit margin vs -3.4%. CRWD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.37. FMX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.01

FMX

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.46
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

FMXUndervalued (+15.9%)

Margin of Safety

+15.9%

Fair Value

$134.78

Current Price

$108.51

$26.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $134.78Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

FMX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
63.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 63.8% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$9.49B8/10

Generating 9.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
22.1x2/10

Trading at 22.1x book value

FMX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
2.3%3/10

2.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FMX

The strongest argument for FMX centers on EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : FMX

The primary concerns for FMX are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 2.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while FMX is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.12 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

FMX generates stronger free cash flow (9.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FMX scores higher overall (59/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Fomento Economico Mexicano

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Fomento Econmico Mexicano, SAB de CV, is a bottler of Coca-Cola brand beverages. The company is headquartered in Monterrey, Mexico.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?