WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsFiscalNote Holdings Inc. (NOTE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 5556% more annual revenue ($5.40B vs $95.41M). CRWD leads profitability with a 0.8% profit margin vs -68.4%. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 43/100 (D).

CRWD

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

NOTE

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -3.27
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

NOTEUndervalued (+43.1%)

Margin of Safety

+43.1%

Fair Value

$2.02

Current Price

$0.04

$1.98 discount

UndervaluedFair: $2.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$211.69B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.8%8/10

Revenue surging 25.8% year-over-year

NOTE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.682/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

NOTE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$4.94M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-86.4%2/10

ROE of -86.4% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-24.7%2/10

Revenue declined 24.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NOTE

The strongest argument for NOTE centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 5168.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : NOTE

The primary concerns for NOTE are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while NOTE is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.8% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (406M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (43/100 vs 32/100) and 25.8% revenue growth. NOTE offers better value entry with a 43.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

FiscalNote Holdings Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

FiscalNote Holdings Inc. is an AI-powered enterprise SaaS company that delivers global legal and regulatory information and data. The company is headquartered in Washington, District of Columbia.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?