WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsSentinelOne Inc (S)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 386% more annual revenue ($5.09B vs $1.05B). CRWD leads profitability with a -0.6% profit margin vs -30.4%. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 39/100 (F).

CRWD

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

S

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.15
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-72.9%)

Margin of Safety

-72.9%

Fair Value

$396.04

Current Price

$671.02

$274.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $396.04Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for S.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$176.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.6%8/10

Revenue surging 25.6% year-over-year

S1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.8%8/10

Revenue surging 20.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
36.9x2/10

Trading at 36.9x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.5%2/10

ROE of -0.5% — below average capital efficiency

S4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-31.4%2/10

ROE of -31.4% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.152/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : S

The strongest argument for S centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : S

The primary concerns for S are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.6% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (493M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (39/100 vs 33/100) and 25.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

SentinelOne Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

SentinelOne, Inc. is a cybersecurity provider in the United States. The company is headquartered in Mountain View, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?