WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 182% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $4.81B). WPP leads profitability with a -1.6% profit margin vs -3.4%. CRWD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.37. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.01

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
22.1x2/10

Trading at 22.1x book value

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.12 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (40/100 vs 35/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?