WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsZenaTech Inc. (ZENA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 57213% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $8.40M). ZENA leads profitability with a 0.0% profit margin vs -3.4%. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.01

ZENA

Avoid

23

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.5Value: 3.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

ZENASignificantly Overvalued (-925.9%)

Margin of Safety

-925.9%

Fair Value

$0.27

Current Price

$2.48

$2.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.27Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

ZENA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
22.1x2/10

Trading at 22.1x book value

ZENA4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$135.71M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
60.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZENA

Revenue growth of 12.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : ZENA

The primary concerns for ZENA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. A P/E of 60.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while ZENA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (376M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (40/100 vs 23/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

ZenaTech Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

ZenaTech, Inc., an enterprise software technology company, develops cloud-based software applications in Canada. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?