WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsZenaTech Inc. (ZENA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 25145% more annual revenue ($5.09B vs $20.18M). ZENA leads profitability with a 0.0% profit margin vs -0.6%. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 39/100 (F).

CRWD

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

ZENA

Avoid

25

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-72.9%)

Margin of Safety

-72.9%

Fair Value

$396.04

Current Price

$673.02

$276.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $396.04Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ZENA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$176.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.6%8/10

Revenue surging 25.6% year-over-year

ZENA2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
640.0%10/10

Revenue surging 640.0% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.209/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
37.0x2/10

Trading at 37.0x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.5%2/10

ROE of -0.5% — below average capital efficiency

ZENA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$128.07M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZENA

The strongest argument for ZENA centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 640.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : ZENA

The primary concerns for ZENA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while ZENA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZENA is growing revenue faster at 640.0% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (493M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (39/100 vs 25/100) and 25.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

ZenaTech Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

ZenaTech, Inc., an enterprise software technology company, develops cloud-based software applications in Canada. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?