WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsZscaler Inc (ZS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 60% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $3.00B). ZS leads profitability with a -2.3% profit margin vs -3.4%. ZS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.5Value: 3.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.98

ZS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-27.0%)

Margin of Safety

-27.0%

Fair Value

$398.25

Current Price

$527.77

$129.52 premium

UndervaluedFair: $398.25Overvalued
ZSUndervalued (+47.3%)

Margin of Safety

+47.3%

Fair Value

$324.31

Current Price

$152.13

$172.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $324.31Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$128.72B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

ZS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.9%8/10

Revenue surging 25.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.932/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
30.2x2/10

Trading at 30.2x book value

ZS4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
11.1x4/10

Trading at 11.1x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZS

The strongest argument for ZS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 25.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : ZS

The primary concerns for ZS are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.

ZS is growing revenue faster at 25.9% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (376M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (40/100 vs 34/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. ZS offers better value entry with a 47.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Zscaler Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Zscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?