WallStSmart

Caesarstone Ltd (CSTE)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 2679% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $381.81M). OSK leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs -37.4%. CSTE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.03. OSK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

CSTE

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.68

OSK

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CSTEUndervalued (+82.4%)

Margin of Safety

+82.4%

Fair Value

$13.17

Current Price

$3.19

$9.98 discount

UndervaluedFair: $13.17Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CSTE2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
587.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 587.0% YoY

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CSTE4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$110.30M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-123.2%2/10

ROE of -123.2% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.5%2/10

Revenue declined 4.5%

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.6%2/10

Earnings declined 7.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CSTE

The strongest argument for CSTE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 1.03 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CSTE

The primary concerns for CSTE are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CSTE profiles as a turnaround stock while OSK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (349M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (50/100 vs 46/100). CSTE offers better value entry with a 82.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Caesarstone Ltd

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Caesarstone Ltd., develops, manufactures and markets quartz surfaces designed under the Caesarstone brand in the United States, Australia, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Israel, Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The company is headquartered in MP Menashe, Israel.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?