WallStSmart

Cantaloupe Inc (CTLP)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 2984% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $320.82M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 1.1%. PANW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 5.04. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

CTLP

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 7.3Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

PANW

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTLPUndervalued (+79.6%)

Margin of Safety

+79.6%

Fair Value

$51.38

Current Price

$11.20

$40.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $51.38Overvalued
PANWUndervalued (+39.7%)

Margin of Safety

+39.7%

Fair Value

$441.96

Current Price

$272.05

$169.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $441.96Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTLP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
201.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 201.7% YoY

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$241.01B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CTLP4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$825.82M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
1.5%3/10

ROE of 1.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.1%3/10

1.1% margin — thin

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
256.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTLP

The strongest argument for CTLP centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CTLP

The primary concerns for CTLP are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 280.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 256.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CTLP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.00 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (57/100 vs 43/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. CTLP offers better value entry with a 79.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cantaloupe Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Cantaloupe, Inc., a software and payments company, provides technology solutions for the underserved retail market. The company is headquartered in Malvern, Pennsylvania.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?