WallStSmart

Cantaloupe Inc (CTLP)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 3016% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $317.56M). CTLP leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs 13.0%. PANW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.96. CTLP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CTLP

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

PANW

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTLPUndervalued (+69.3%)

Margin of Safety

+69.3%

Fair Value

$34.16

Current Price

$10.65

$23.51 discount

UndervaluedFair: $34.16Overvalued
PANWSignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$84.24

Current Price

$153.22

$68.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $84.24Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTLP2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
24.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
14.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$128.28B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CTLP4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$773.33M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
8.692/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-614,0002/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.5x4/10

Trading at 11.5x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.962/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
87.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTLP

The strongest argument for CTLP centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 6.9%.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CTLP

The primary concerns for CTLP are EPS Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 87.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CTLP profiles as a mature stock while PANW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CTLP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (470M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CTLP scores higher overall (59/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cantaloupe Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Cantaloupe, Inc., a software and payments company, provides technology solutions for the underserved retail market. The company is headquartered in Malvern, Pennsylvania.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?