WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsIron Mountain Incorporated (IRM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Iron Mountain Incorporated generates 513% more annual revenue ($6.90B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 29.6% profit margin vs 2.1%. IRM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.70. CUBE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

CUBE

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.57

IRM

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.0Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBESignificantly Overvalued (-288.8%)

Margin of Safety

-288.8%

Fair Value

$9.93

Current Price

$35.96

$26.03 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.93Overvalued
IRMSignificantly Overvalued (-2909.6%)

Margin of Safety

-2909.6%

Fair Value

$3.33

Current Price

$98.30

$94.97 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.33Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.5%

Profit MarginProfitability
29.6%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

IRM3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
225.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 225 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
22.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.6%8/10

16.6% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.332/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-21.7%2/10

Earnings declined 21.7%

IRM4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
200.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.6% and operating margin at 39.5%.

Bull Case : IRM

The strongest argument for IRM centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : IRM

The primary concerns for IRM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 200.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a mature stock while IRM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

IRM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.

IRM is growing revenue faster at 16.6% — sustainability is the question.

CUBE generates stronger free cash flow (122M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CUBE scores higher overall (54/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 29.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Iron Mountain Incorporated

REAL ESTATE · REIT - SPECIALTY · USA

Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM) is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?