WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsRedwood Trust Inc (RWT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CubeSmart generates 578% more annual revenue ($1.13B vs $167.46M). CUBE leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs -54.7%. RWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.47. CUBE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CUBE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.43

RWT

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.0Profit: 2.0Value: 7.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.00
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBEUndervalued (+26.7%)

Margin of Safety

+26.7%

Fair Value

$52.70

Current Price

$42.43

$10.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $52.70Overvalued
RWTUndervalued (+36.8%)

Margin of Safety

+36.8%

Fair Value

$10.60

Current Price

$4.68

$5.92 discount

UndervaluedFair: $10.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.9%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

RWT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.3x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.323/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

RWT4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$641.11M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.6%2/10

ROE of -9.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-13.4%2/10

Revenue declined 13.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.6%2/10

Earnings declined 52.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 40.3%.

Bull Case : RWT

The strongest argument for RWT centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.47 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : RWT

The primary concerns for RWT are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 26.42 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a value stock while RWT is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

RWT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.43 — expect wider price swings.

CUBE is growing revenue faster at 3.3% — sustainability is the question.

CUBE generates stronger free cash flow (149M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CUBE scores higher overall (49/100 vs 39/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins. RWT offers better value entry with a 36.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Redwood Trust Inc

REAL ESTATE · REIT - MORTGAGE · USA

Redwood Trust, Inc., is a specialized finance company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Mill Valley, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?