WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsTeradyne Inc (TER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Teradyne Inc generates 234% more annual revenue ($3.79B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 22.6%. TER appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.51. TER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B+).

CUBE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.57

TER

Strong Buy

75

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 9.5Value: 3.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBEUndervalued (+33.7%)

Margin of Safety

+33.7%

Fair Value

$58.21

Current Price

$40.46

$17.75 discount

UndervaluedFair: $58.21Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TER.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.9%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

TER6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
37.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.6%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
87.0%10/10

Revenue surging 87.0% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
314.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 314.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$55.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
28.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
22.6%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TER3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.514/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
65.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
20.1x2/10

Trading at 20.1x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 40.3%.

Bull Case : TER

The strongest argument for TER centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.6% and operating margin at 37.6%. Revenue growth of 87.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : TER

The primary concerns for TER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 65.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a value stock while TER is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.79 — expect wider price swings.

TER is growing revenue faster at 87.0% — sustainability is the question.

TER generates stronger free cash flow (200M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TER scores higher overall (75/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 22.6% margins and 87.0% revenue growth. CUBE offers better value entry with a 33.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Teradyne Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?