WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 809% more annual revenue ($10.23B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 29.6% profit margin vs 13.0%. VRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.83. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CUBE

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.57

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBESignificantly Overvalued (-297.2%)

Margin of Safety

-297.2%

Fair Value

$9.72

Current Price

$35.96

$26.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.72Overvalued
VRTSignificantly Overvalued (-55.7%)

Margin of Safety

-55.7%

Fair Value

$159.59

Current Price

$251.07

$91.48 premium

UndervaluedFair: $159.59Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.5%

Profit MarginProfitability
29.6%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

VRT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
41.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 42 in profit

Market CapQuality
$103.64B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
21.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Revenue surging 22.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.332/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

VRT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.834/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% earnings growth

P/E RatioValuation
79.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
24.4x2/10

Trading at 24.4x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.6% and operating margin at 39.5%.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 22.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 79.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a mature stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.08 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 22.7% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (912M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 54/100) and 22.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?