WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsVentas Inc (VTR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ventas Inc generates 439% more annual revenue ($6.11B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 4.3%. VTR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.74. VTR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

CUBE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.43

VTR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 4.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.43
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBEUndervalued (+27.0%)

Margin of Safety

+27.0%

Fair Value

$52.92

Current Price

$40.31

$12.61 discount

UndervaluedFair: $52.92Overvalued
VTROvervalued (-9.8%)

Margin of Safety

-9.8%

Fair Value

$77.07

Current Price

$79.09

$2.02 premium

UndervaluedFair: $77.07Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.9%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

VTR2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.9%8/10

Revenue surging 21.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.3x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.323/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

VTR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.744/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
2.0%3/10

ROE of 2.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
153.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 40.3%.

Bull Case : VTR

The strongest argument for VTR centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 21.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : VTR

The primary concerns for VTR are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 153.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a value stock while VTR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CUBE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.08 — expect wider price swings.

VTR is growing revenue faster at 21.9% — sustainability is the question.

CUBE generates stronger free cash flow (149M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VTR scores higher overall (51/100 vs 49/100) and 21.9% revenue growth. CUBE offers better value entry with a 27.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Ventas Inc

REAL ESTATE · REIT - HEALTHCARE FACILITIES · USA

Ventas, Inc. is a real estate investment trust specializing in the ownership and management of health care facilities in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?