WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsVentas Inc (VTR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ventas Inc generates 443% more annual revenue ($6.11B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 29.6% profit margin vs 4.3%. VTR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.72. VTR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

CUBE

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.57

VTR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBEUndervalued (+33.0%)

Margin of Safety

+33.0%

Fair Value

$57.58

Current Price

$40.48

$17.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $57.58Overvalued
VTRUndervalued (+4.9%)

Margin of Safety

+4.9%

Fair Value

$90.07

Current Price

$87.86

$2.21 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.07Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.5%

Profit MarginProfitability
29.6%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

VTR1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.9%8/10

Revenue surging 21.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.332/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

VTR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.724/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
2.1%3/10

ROE of 2.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
158.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.6% and operating margin at 39.5%.

Bull Case : VTR

The strongest argument for VTR centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 21.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : VTR

The primary concerns for VTR are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 158.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a mature stock while VTR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CUBE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

VTR is growing revenue faster at 21.9% — sustainability is the question.

VTR generates stronger free cash flow (322M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CUBE scores higher overall (51/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 29.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Ventas Inc

REAL ESTATE · REIT - HEALTHCARE FACILITIES · USA

Ventas, Inc. is a real estate investment trust specializing in the ownership and management of health care facilities in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?