WallStSmart

Carnival Plc ADS (CUK)vsProcter & Gamble Company (PG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Procter & Gamble Company generates 221% more annual revenue ($86.72B vs $26.98B). PG leads profitability with a 19.2% profit margin vs 11.5%. CUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.05. CUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CUK

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.89

PG

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUKUndervalued (+80.9%)

Margin of Safety

+80.9%

Fair Value

$171.68

Current Price

$27.47

$144.21 discount

UndervaluedFair: $171.68Overvalued
PGSignificantly Overvalued (-36.1%)

Margin of Safety

-36.1%

Fair Value

$107.56

Current Price

$146.42

$38.86 premium

UndervaluedFair: $107.56Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUK4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
27.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 28 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
35.8%8/10

Earnings expanding 35.8% YoY

PG5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$340.95B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
31.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
23.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.03B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CUK2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.892/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
2.281/10

Elevated debt levels

PG1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUK

The strongest argument for CUK centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.05 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PG

The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.2% and operating margin at 23.1%.

Bear Case : CUK

The primary concerns for CUK are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.28 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : PG

The primary concerns for PG are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUK profiles as a value stock while PG is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CUK carries more volatility with a beta of 2.33 — expect wider price swings.

PG is growing revenue faster at 7.4% — sustainability is the question.

PG generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CUK scores higher overall (67/100 vs 61/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Carnival Plc ADS

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · TRAVEL SERVICES · USA

Carnival Corporation & plc is a leisure travel company. The company is headquartered in Miami, Florida.

Visit Website →

Procter & Gamble Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?