Carnival Plc ADS (CUK)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)
CUK
Carnival Plc ADS
$27.47
0.00%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $38.08B
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
$21.57
-1.55%
ENERGY · Cap: $43.23B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Carnival Plc ADS generates 108% more annual revenue ($26.98B vs $12.98B). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs 11.5%. CUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.05. CUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).
CUK
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
WDS
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+80.9%
Fair Value
$171.68
Current Price
$27.47
$144.21 discount
Margin of Safety
+31.5%
Fair Value
$27.39
Current Price
$21.57
$5.82 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 28 in profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 35.8% YoY
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Revenue declined 11.1%
Earnings declined 14.4%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CUK
The strongest argument for CUK centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.05 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : WDS
The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : CUK
The primary concerns for CUK are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.28 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : WDS
The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CUK profiles as a value stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
CUK carries more volatility with a beta of 2.33 — expect wider price swings.
CUK is growing revenue faster at 6.1% — sustainability is the question.
CUK generates stronger free cash flow (697M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CUK scores higher overall (67/100 vs 53/100). WDS offers better value entry with a 31.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Carnival Plc ADS
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · TRAVEL SERVICES · USA
Carnival Corporation & plc is a leisure travel company. The company is headquartered in Miami, Florida.
Visit Website →Woodside Energy Group Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.
Compare with Other TRAVEL SERVICES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?