WallStSmart

CPI Aerostructures Inc (CVU)vsRaytheon Technologies Corp (RTX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Raytheon Technologies Corp generates 123359% more annual revenue ($88.60B vs $71.77M). RTX leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs -1.3%. CVU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.52. RTX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

CVU

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.19

RTX

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.55
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CVU.

RTXSignificantly Overvalued (-95.4%)

Margin of Safety

-95.4%

Fair Value

$99.80

Current Price

$195.00

$95.20 premium

UndervaluedFair: $99.80Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CVU2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.528/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RTX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$261.12B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.19B8/10

Generating 3.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CVU4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$26.71M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.043/10

Elevated debt levels

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.9%2/10

ROE of -3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-27.1%2/10

Revenue declined 27.1%

RTX4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.554/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
2.782/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CVU

The strongest argument for CVU centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.52 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RTX

The strongest argument for RTX centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 12.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CVU

The primary concerns for CVU are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : RTX

The primary concerns for RTX are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CVU profiles as a turnaround stock while RTX is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CVU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.08 — expect wider price swings.

RTX is growing revenue faster at 12.1% — sustainability is the question.

RTX generates stronger free cash flow (3.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

RTX scores higher overall (55/100 vs 35/100) and 12.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CPI Aerostructures Inc

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

CPI Aerostructures, Inc. is engaged in contract production of aircraft structural parts for fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters in the commercial and defense markets. The company is headquartered in Edgewood, New York.

Visit Website →

Raytheon Technologies Corp

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Raytheon Technologies Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest aerospace, intelligence services providers, and defense manufacturers in the world by revenue and market capitalization. Raytheon Technologies (RTX) researches, develops, and manufactures advanced technology products in the aerospace and defense industry, including aircraft engines, avionics, aerostructures, cybersecurity, guided missiles, air defense systems, satellites, and drones.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?