WallStSmart

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 2045% more annual revenue ($75.05B vs $3.50B). CW leads profitability with a 13.8% profit margin vs 6.7%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.34. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

CW

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9

LMT

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWSignificantly Overvalued (-28.9%)

Margin of Safety

-28.9%

Fair Value

$491.88

Current Price

$702.25

$210.37 premium

UndervaluedFair: $491.88Overvalued
LMTUndervalued (+37.5%)

Margin of Safety

+37.5%

Fair Value

$1005.26

Current Price

$624.20

$381.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1005.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.3%

LMT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
76.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 77 in profit

Market CapQuality
$144.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.76B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CW3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
10.2x4/10

Trading at 10.2x book value

P/E RatioValuation
54.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CW

The strongest argument for CW centers on Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CW

The primary concerns for CW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 54.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

CW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

LMT generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AEROSPACE & DEFENSE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (65/100 vs 61/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Curtiss-Wright Corporation designs, manufactures and repairs precision components and engineering products and services primarily for the aerospace, defense, general industrial and power generation markets worldwide.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?