WallStSmart

Danaos Corporation (DAC)vsIcon Energy Corp. (ICON)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Danaos Corporation generates 6689% more annual revenue ($1.06B vs $15.54M). DAC leads profitability with a 51.3% profit margin vs -5.6%. DAC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

DAC

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 8.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.39

ICON

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.43

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DAC6 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
5.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
51.3%10/10

Keeps 51 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
48.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 48.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

ICON3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
107.0%10/10

Revenue surging 107.0% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
32.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 32.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

DAC2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.7%4/10

4.7% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

ICON4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$3.48M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.243/10

Elevated debt levels

Return on EquityProfitability
-25.3%2/10

ROE of -25.3% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-848,0002/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DAC

The strongest argument for DAC centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.3% and operating margin at 48.4%. PEG of 0.12 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : ICON

The strongest argument for ICON centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 107.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DAC

The primary concerns for DAC are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : ICON

The primary concerns for ICON are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DAC profiles as a value stock while ICON is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ICON carries more volatility with a beta of 5.57 — expect wider price swings.

ICON is growing revenue faster at 107.0% — sustainability is the question.

DAC generates stronger free cash flow (20M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DAC scores higher overall (71/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 51.3% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Danaos Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Danaos Corporation owns and operates container ships in Australia, Asia, Europe and the United States. The company is headquartered in Piraeus, Greece.

Icon Energy Corp.

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Iconix Brand Group, Inc., a brand management company, owns and licenses a portfolio of consumer brands in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?