WallStSmart

Deere & Company (DE)vsMaximus Inc (MMS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Deere & Company generates 770% more annual revenue ($46.73B vs $5.37B). DE leads profitability with a 10.3% profit margin vs 6.9%. DE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.69. MMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

DE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.18

MMS

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 8.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.69
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DE.

MMSUndervalued (+65.8%)

Margin of Safety

+65.8%

Fair Value

$221.37

Current Price

$65.35

$156.02 discount

UndervaluedFair: $221.37Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DE1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$159.33B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

MMS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
146.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 146.5% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
22.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.694/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

MMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.064/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.013/10

Elevated debt levels

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.1%2/10

Revenue declined 4.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DE

The strongest argument for DE centers on Market Cap.

Bull Case : MMS

The strongest argument for MMS centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : DE

The primary concerns for DE are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MMS

The primary concerns for MMS are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DE profiles as a declining stock while MMS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

DE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.

MMS is growing revenue faster at -4.1% — sustainability is the question.

MMS generates stronger free cash flow (-251M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MMS scores higher overall (64/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Deere & Company

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

John Deere is the brand name of Deere & Company, an American corporation that manufactures agricultural, construction, and forestry machinery, diesel engines, drivetrains (axles, transmissions, gearboxes) used in heavy equipment, and lawn care equipment.

Maximus Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Maximus, Inc. provides Business Process Services (BPS) to government health and human services programs worldwide. The company is headquartered in Reston, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?