WallStSmart

Deere & Company (DE)vsPDD Holdings Inc. (PDD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PDD Holdings Inc. generates 824% more annual revenue ($431.85B vs $46.73B). PDD leads profitability with a 22.7% profit margin vs 10.3%. PDD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.70. PDD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B+).

DE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.18

PDD

Strong Buy

75

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.5Value: 9.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DE.

PDDUndervalued (+78.0%)

Margin of Safety

+78.0%

Fair Value

$485.14

Current Price

$98.78

$386.36 discount

UndervaluedFair: $485.14Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DE1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$156.81B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PDD6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Free Cash FlowQuality
$24.12B10/10

Generating 24.1B in free cash flow

Market CapQuality
$145.63B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
26.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 27 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
22.7%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

DE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.744/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
32.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

PDD2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-16.4%2/10

Earnings declined 16.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DE

The strongest argument for DE centers on Market Cap.

Bull Case : PDD

The strongest argument for PDD centers on P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.7% and operating margin at 21.1%. Revenue growth of 12.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DE

The primary concerns for DE are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : PDD

The primary concerns for PDD are Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DE profiles as a declining stock while PDD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

DE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

PDD is growing revenue faster at 12.0% — sustainability is the question.

PDD generates stronger free cash flow (24.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PDD scores higher overall (75/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 22.7% margins and 12.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Deere & Company

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

John Deere is the brand name of Deere & Company, an American corporation that manufactures agricultural, construction, and forestry machinery, diesel engines, drivetrains (axles, transmissions, gearboxes) used in heavy equipment, and lawn care equipment.

PDD Holdings Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · China

Pinduoduo Inc., operates an electronic commerce platform in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, the People's Republic of China.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?