WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsConsolidated Edison Inc (ED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 88% more annual revenue ($31.79B vs $16.92B). DUK leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs 12.0%. ED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.61. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

DUK

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

ED

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 40.41
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-198.2%)

Margin of Safety

-198.2%

Fair Value

$42.98

Current Price

$127.38

$84.40 premium

UndervaluedFair: $42.98Overvalued
EDSignificantly Overvalued (-186.5%)

Margin of Safety

-186.5%

Fair Value

$38.35

Current Price

$110.03

$71.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$98.62B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.1%

ED2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
40.4110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.753/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Earnings declined 2.2%

ED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.193/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.612/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-8.3%2/10

Earnings declined 8.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 28.1%.

Bull Case : ED

The strongest argument for ED centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.75 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : ED

The primary concerns for ED are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK profiles as a mature stock while ED is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

DUK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.47 — expect wider price swings.

ED is growing revenue faster at 8.9% — sustainability is the question.

ED generates stronger free cash flow (176M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (59/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 15.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Consolidated Edison Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison (stylized as conEdison) or ConEd, is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues as of 2017, and over $48 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?