WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsEmera Incorporated (EMA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 267% more annual revenue ($32.72B vs $8.91B). DUK leads profitability with a 15.7% profit margin vs 12.0%. DUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.54. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

DUK

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

EMA

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.59

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$94.40B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.5%

EMA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.5%

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.663/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.542/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.58B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

EMA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.693/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.922/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.6%2/10

Earnings declined 5.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.7% and operating margin at 25.5%. Revenue growth of 11.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : EMA

The strongest argument for EMA centers on Operating Margin, Price/Book.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.66 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : EMA

The primary concerns for EMA are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK profiles as a mature stock while EMA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EMA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.45 — expect wider price swings.

DUK is growing revenue faster at 11.3% — sustainability is the question.

EMA generates stronger free cash flow (-104M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (67/100 vs 60/100), backed by strong 15.7% margins and 11.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Emera Incorporated

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Emera Incorporated, an energy and services company, invests in generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in the United States, Canada, Barbados, and the Bahamas. The company is headquartered in Halifax, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?