WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsEmera Incorporated (EMA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 267% more annual revenue ($32.80B vs $8.94B). DUK leads profitability with a 16.0% profit margin vs 11.6%. DUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.22. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

DUK

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

EMA

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-79.6%)

Margin of Safety

-79.6%

Fair Value

$66.50

Current Price

$119.42

$52.92 premium

UndervaluedFair: $66.50Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EMA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$93.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
18.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

EMA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.673/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EMA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.2%4/10

1.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Debt/EquityHealth
1.543/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.0% and operating margin at 27.5%.

Bull Case : EMA

The strongest argument for EMA centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.67 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : EMA

The primary concerns for EMA are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.54 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EMA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.43 — expect wider price swings.

EMA is growing revenue faster at 1.2% — sustainability is the question.

EMA generates stronger free cash flow (-210M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (63/100 vs 54/100), backed by strong 16.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Emera Incorporated

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Emera Incorporated, an energy and services company, invests in generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in the United States, Canada, Barbados, and the Bahamas. The company is headquartered in Halifax, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?