WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsEmera Incorporated (EMA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 262% more annual revenue ($31.79B vs $8.78B). DUK leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs 12.4%. EMA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.08. EMA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

DUK

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

EMA

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-198.2%)

Margin of Safety

-198.2%

Fair Value

$42.98

Current Price

$127.38

$84.40 premium

UndervaluedFair: $42.98Overvalued
EMASignificantly Overvalued (-193.3%)

Margin of Safety

-193.3%

Fair Value

$16.73

Current Price

$51.08

$34.35 premium

UndervaluedFair: $16.73Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$98.62B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.1%

EMA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.753/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Earnings declined 2.2%

EMA2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-56.9%2/10

Earnings declined 56.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-753.39M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 28.1%.

Bull Case : EMA

The strongest argument for EMA centers on Price/Book. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.08 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.75 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : EMA

The primary concerns for EMA are EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK profiles as a mature stock while EMA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EMA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

EMA is growing revenue faster at 13.8% — sustainability is the question.

DUK generates stronger free cash flow (-463M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EMA scores higher overall (60/100 vs 59/100) and 13.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Emera Incorporated

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Emera Incorporated, an energy and services company, invests in generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in the United States, Canada, Barbados, and the Bahamas. The company is headquartered in Halifax, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?