WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsFortis Inc (FTS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 161% more annual revenue ($31.79B vs $12.17B). DUK leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs 14.8%. FTS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.67. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

DUK

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

FTS

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.71
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-198.2%)

Margin of Safety

-198.2%

Fair Value

$42.98

Current Price

$127.38

$84.40 premium

UndervaluedFair: $42.98Overvalued
FTSSignificantly Overvalued (-48.5%)

Margin of Safety

-48.5%

Fair Value

$36.70

Current Price

$55.35

$18.65 premium

UndervaluedFair: $36.70Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$98.62B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.1%

FTS2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.9%

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.753/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Earnings declined 2.2%

FTS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
7.6%3/10

ROE of 7.6% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.672/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 28.1%.

Bull Case : FTS

The strongest argument for FTS centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.75 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : FTS

The primary concerns for FTS are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK profiles as a mature stock while FTS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

DUK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.47 — expect wider price swings.

DUK is growing revenue faster at 8.0% — sustainability is the question.

DUK generates stronger free cash flow (-463M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (59/100 vs 57/100), backed by strong 15.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Fortis Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Fortis Inc. is a gas and electric utility company in Canada, the United States, and the Caribbean countries. The company is headquartered in St. John's, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?