WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsMGE Energy Inc (MGEE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 4261% more annual revenue ($32.80B vs $752.13M). MGEE leads profitability with a 19.9% profit margin vs 16.0%. DUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.22. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

DUK

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

MGEE

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.20
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-79.6%)

Margin of Safety

-79.6%

Fair Value

$66.50

Current Price

$119.42

$52.92 premium

UndervaluedFair: $66.50Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MGEE.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$93.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
18.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

MGEE3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
23.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 23.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.673/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

MGEE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.122/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-41.63M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.0% and operating margin at 27.5%.

Bull Case : MGEE

The strongest argument for MGEE centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.9% and operating margin at 22.7%.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.67 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MGEE

The primary concerns for MGEE are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MGEE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.70 — expect wider price swings.

MGEE is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

MGEE generates stronger free cash flow (-42M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (63/100 vs 61/100), backed by strong 16.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

MGE Energy Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

MGE Energy, Inc., is a utility holding company primarily in Wisconsin. The company is headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?