WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsPowerBank Corporation (SUUN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 73444% more annual revenue ($32.80B vs $44.60M). DUK leads profitability with a 16.0% profit margin vs -21.9%. DUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.22. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

DUK

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

SUUN

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-79.6%)

Margin of Safety

-79.6%

Fair Value

$66.50

Current Price

$119.42

$52.92 premium

UndervaluedFair: $66.50Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SUUN.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$93.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
18.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

SUUN1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.673/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SUUN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$36.79M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-63.1%2/10

ROE of -63.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.0% and operating margin at 27.5%.

Bull Case : SUUN

The strongest argument for SUUN centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.67 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SUUN

The primary concerns for SUUN are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK profiles as a value stock while SUUN is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

DUK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.36 — expect wider price swings.

DUK is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

SUUN generates stronger free cash flow (-16M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (63/100 vs 28/100), backed by strong 16.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

PowerBank Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - RENEWABLE · USA

PowerBank Corporation is an independent renewable and clean energy project developer, power producer, and asset operator in Canada and the United States. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?