WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsTrade Desk Inc (TTD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 998% more annual revenue ($31.79B vs $2.90B). DUK leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs 15.3%. TTD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.86. TTD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

DUK

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

TTD

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-198.2%)

Margin of Safety

-198.2%

Fair Value

$42.98

Current Price

$127.38

$84.40 premium

UndervaluedFair: $42.98Overvalued
TTDSignificantly Overvalued (-60.9%)

Margin of Safety

-60.9%

Fair Value

$16.92

Current Price

$21.97

$5.05 premium

UndervaluedFair: $16.92Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$98.62B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.1%

TTD2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

PEG RatioValuation
0.868/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.753/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Earnings declined 2.2%

TTD2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 28.1%.

Bull Case : TTD

The strongest argument for TTD centers on Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.3% and operating margin at 30.3%. Revenue growth of 14.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.75 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TTD

The primary concerns for TTD are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TTD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.19 — expect wider price swings.

TTD is growing revenue faster at 14.3% — sustainability is the question.

TTD generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TTD scores higher overall (72/100 vs 59/100), backed by strong 15.3% margins and 14.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Trade Desk Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Trade Desk, Inc. is a technology company in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Ventura, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?